Match statistics snapshot
- Grenoble was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 22%).
- Concarneau held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Grenoble | Statistic | Concarneau |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 3 | Shots off target | 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Grenoble | Statistic | Concarneau |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 332 | Accurate passes | 504Lead |
| 408 | Total passes | 579Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Grenoble | Statistic | Concarneau |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Grenoble | Statistic | Concarneau |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Grenoble | Statistic | Concarneau |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |