Match statistics snapshot
- AFC Wimbledon fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
- Grimsby was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 30%).
- Grimsby held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Grimsby | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Grimsby | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 64%Lead | Pass accuracy | 56% |
| 203Lead | Accurate passes | 158 |
| 316Lead | Total passes | 281 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Grimsby | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Grimsby | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Grimsby | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.