Match statistics snapshot
- Grimsby was more accurate in front of goal (14% on target vs 0%).
- Forest Green held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Grimsby | Statistic | Forest Green |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 3Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots off target |
| 3 |
| 1Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Grimsby | Statistic | Forest Green |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 53% | Pass accuracy | 74%Lead |
| 121 | Accurate passes | 319Lead |
| 230 | Total passes | 429Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Grimsby | Statistic | Forest Green |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Grimsby | Statistic | Forest Green |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| Goalkeeper saves |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Grimsby | Statistic | Forest Green |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |