Match statistics snapshot
- Grimsby fired more attempts (24 vs 3 shots).
- Gillingham was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 38%).
- Grimsby held more of the ball (78% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Grimsby | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | ||
3 | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 1Lead |
14Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
9Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
9Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
10Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
24Lead | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 3 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Grimsby | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
78%Lead | Ball possession | 22% |
86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 40% |
503Lead | Accurate passes | 67 |
583Lead | Total passes | 166 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Grimsby | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Grimsby | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
6Lead | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 0 |
2 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Grimsby | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
24 | Fouls | 3Lead |
0Lead | Red cards | 2 |
3Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Gillingham leads this block
Gillingham leads shot accuracy (+78% vs Grimsby)
Gillingham leads shot accuracy (+78% vs Grimsby)
Gillingham leads (67% vs 58%).
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Grimsby leads this block
Gillingham — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Gillingham — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Grimsby leads this block
Grimsby leads territorial pressure (+513% vs Gillingham)
Grimsby leads territorial pressure (+513% vs Gillingham)
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Grimsby leads this block
Grimsby had the edge in 4 of 4 signals in this block.
Grimsby leads (30.0 vs 25.0).
Grimsby leads (67.1 vs 8.8).
Grimsby leads (20.0 vs 4.0).
Grimsby leads (33.0 vs 15.0).