Match statistics snapshot
- Grimsby fired more attempts (24 vs 3 shots).
- Gillingham was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 38%).
- Grimsby held more of the ball (78% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Grimsby | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Grimsby | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 78%Lead | Ball possession | 22% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 40% |
| 503Lead | Accurate passes | 67 |
| 583Lead | Total passes | 166 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Grimsby | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Grimsby | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Grimsby | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 24 | Fouls | 3Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 2 |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |