Match statistics snapshot
- Grimsby created the clearer chances on xG (2.37 vs 0.78, Δ 1.59).
- Grimsby fired more attempts (17 vs 7 shots).
- Walsall was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 47%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Grimsby | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 2.37Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.78 |
| Offsides | ||
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Grimsby | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 52% |
| 282Lead | Accurate passes | 123 |
| 381Lead | Total passes | 237 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Grimsby | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Grimsby | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Grimsby | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |