Match statistics snapshot
- Guadalajara Chivas fired more attempts (19 vs 11 shots).
- Tigres UANL was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Guadalajara Chivas | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 8Lead |
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Guadalajara Chivas | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 373Lead | Accurate passes | 348 |
| 454Lead | Total passes | 438 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Guadalajara Chivas | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Guadalajara Chivas | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Guadalajara Chivas | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |