Match statistics snapshot
- Guadalajara Chivas created the clearer chances on xG (0.77 vs 0.19, Δ 0.58).
- Guadalajara Chivas fired more attempts (10 vs 2 shots).
- Tigres UANL was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Guadalajara Chivas | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 0.77Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.19 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Guadalajara Chivas | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 72%Lead | Ball possession | 28% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 229Lead | Accurate passes | 75 |
| 261Lead | Total passes | 109 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Guadalajara Chivas | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Guadalajara Chivas | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| 0.23 | Goals prevented | 0.23 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Guadalajara Chivas | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.