Match statistics snapshot
- Guangzhou Evergrande FC fired more attempts (26 vs 9 shots).
- SHANGHAI SIPG was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 31%).
- Guangzhou Evergrande FC held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Guangzhou Evergrande Fc | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 18Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 11Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 26Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Guangzhou Evergrande Fc | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 421Lead | Accurate passes | 195 |
| 519Lead | Total passes | 294 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Guangzhou Evergrande Fc | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Guangzhou Evergrande Fc | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Guangzhou Evergrande Fc | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 23 | Fouls | 18Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 2 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 7 |