Match statistics snapshot
- Guarani Campinas fired more attempts (17 vs 6 shots).
- Criciuma was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
- Guarani Campinas held more of the ball (70% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Guarani Campinas | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Guarani Campinas | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 58% |
| 410Lead | Accurate passes | 129 |
| 495Lead | Total passes | 221 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Guarani Campinas | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Guarani Campinas | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Guarani Campinas | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.