Match statistics snapshot
- Guingamp fired more attempts (20 vs 4 shots).
- Clermont Foot was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 15%).
- Guingamp held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Guingamp | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Guingamp | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 540Lead | Accurate passes | 302 |
| 618Lead | Total passes | 374 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Guingamp | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Guingamp | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Guingamp | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |