Match statistics snapshot
- Häcken W created the clearer chances on xG (4.45 vs 0.32, Δ 4.13).
- Häcken W fired more attempts (25 vs 4 shots).
- Häcken W was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Häcken W | Statistic | Piteå W |
|---|---|---|
| 4.45Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.32 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Häcken W | Statistic | Piteå W |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 528Lead | Accurate passes | 207 |
| 622Lead | Total passes | 277 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Häcken W | Statistic | Piteå W |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Häcken W | Statistic | Piteå W |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Häcken W | Statistic | Piteå W |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |