Match statistics snapshot
- Häcken W created the clearer chances on xG (1.87 vs 1.58, Δ 0.29).
- Häcken W fired more attempts (20 vs 12 shots).
- Piteå W was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Häcken W | Statistic | Piteå W |
|---|---|---|
| 1.87Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.58 |
| 6 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Häcken W | Statistic | Piteå W |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 413Lead | Accurate passes | 197 |
| 523Lead | Total passes | 275 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Häcken W | Statistic | Piteå W |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Häcken W | Statistic | Piteå W |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Häcken W | Statistic | Piteå W |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0 | Yellow cards | 0 |