Match statistics snapshot
- HJK Helsinki created the clearer chances on xG (0.37 vs 2.44, Δ 2.07).
- HJK Helsinki fired more attempts (24 vs 5 shots).
- Haka was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Haka | Statistic | Hjk Helsinki |
|---|---|---|
| 0.37 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.44Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 24Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Haka | Statistic | Hjk Helsinki |
|---|---|---|
| 29% | Ball possession | 71%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 148 | Accurate passes | 646Lead |
| 217 | Total passes | 723Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Haka | Statistic | Hjk Helsinki |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Haka | Statistic | Hjk Helsinki |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Haka | Statistic | Hjk Helsinki |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |