Match statistics snapshot
- Haka created the clearer chances on xG (1.42 vs 0.96, Δ 0.46).
- Haka fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Kooteepee was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Haka | Statistic | Kooteepee |
|---|---|---|
| 1.42Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.96 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Haka | Statistic | Kooteepee |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 344 | Accurate passes | 370Lead |
| 410 | Total passes | 443Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Haka | Statistic | Kooteepee |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Haka | Statistic | Kooteepee |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Haka | Statistic | Kooteepee |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |