Match statistics snapshot
- Kooteepee created the clearer chances on xG (0.84 vs 1.65, Δ 0.81).
- Kooteepee fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- Kooteepee was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Haka | Statistic | Kooteepee |
|---|---|---|
| 0.84 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.65Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Haka | Statistic | Kooteepee |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 258 | Accurate passes | 325Lead |
| 346 | Total passes | 415Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Haka | Statistic | Kooteepee |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 13Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Haka | Statistic | Kooteepee |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Haka | Statistic | Kooteepee |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 7 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |