Match statistics snapshot
- Verl created the clearer chances on xG (0.91 vs 1.28, Δ 0.37).
- Verl fired more attempts (15 vs 13 shots).
- Verl was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hallescher Fc | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 0.91 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.28Lead |
| 8 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hallescher Fc | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 205 | Accurate passes | 410Lead |
| 267 | Total passes | 466Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hallescher Fc | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hallescher Fc | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hallescher Fc | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |
Statistics is not available yet.