Match statistics snapshot
- Halmstad created the clearer chances on xG (1.84 vs 0.67, Δ 1.17).
- Halmstad fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Halmstad was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 10%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 1.84Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.67 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 285 | Accurate passes | 446Lead |
| 369 | Total passes | 544Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |