Match statistics snapshot
- Degerfors IF created the clearer chances on xG (0.33 vs 4.44, Δ 4.11).
- Degerfors IF fired more attempts (18 vs 7 shots).
- Halmstad held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 0.33 | Expected goals (xG) | 4.44Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 386Lead | Accurate passes | 209 |
| 480Lead | Total passes | 286 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |