Match statistics snapshot
- Degerfors IF created the clearer chances on xG (0.31 vs 1.70, Δ 1.39).
- Degerfors IF fired more attempts (10 vs 6 shots).
- Degerfors IF was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 0.31 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.70Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 341Lead | Accurate passes | 268 |
| 444Lead | Total passes | 366 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.