Match statistics snapshot
- Halmstad created the clearer chances on xG (3.35 vs 0.42, Δ 2.93).
- Halmstad was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 29%).
- Djurgardens IF held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Djurgardens If |
|---|---|---|
| 3.35Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.42 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Djurgardens If |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 210 | Accurate passes | 425Lead |
| 280 | Total passes | 491Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Djurgardens If |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Djurgardens If |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Djurgardens If |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |