Match statistics snapshot
- Halmstad created the clearer chances on xG (3.81 vs 1.63, Δ 2.18).
- Gais fired more attempts (21 vs 12 shots).
- Halmstad was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Gais |
|---|---|---|
| 3.81Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.63 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 17Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Gais |
|---|---|---|
| 28% | Ball possession | 72%Lead |
| 61% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 132 | Accurate passes | 474Lead |
| 215 | Total passes | 554Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Gais |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Gais |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Gais |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |