Match statistics snapshot
- Gais created the clearer chances on xG (1.83 vs 3.34, Δ 1.51).
- Gais fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
- Gais was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Gais |
|---|---|---|
| 1.83 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.34Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Gais |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 357 | Accurate passes | 374Lead |
| 464 | Total passes | 473Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Gais |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Gais |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Gais |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.