Match statistics snapshot
- IF Brommapojkarna created the clearer chances on xG (1.26 vs 1.46, Δ 0.20).
- IF Brommapojkarna fired more attempts (19 vs 8 shots).
- IF Brommapojkarna was more accurate in front of goal (37% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Halmstad | Statistic | If Brommapojkarna |
|---|---|---|
| 1.26 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.46Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Halmstad | Statistic | If Brommapojkarna |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 321 | Accurate passes | 390Lead |
| 416 | Total passes | 484Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Halmstad | Statistic | If Brommapojkarna |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Halmstad | Statistic | If Brommapojkarna |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Halmstad | Statistic | If Brommapojkarna |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |