Match statistics snapshot
- Halmstad created the clearer chances on xG (0.75 vs 0.22, Δ 0.53).
- Halmstad fired more attempts (5 vs 4 shots).
- IF elfsborg was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Halmstad | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 0.75Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.22 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 2Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 3Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Halmstad | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 311 | Accurate passes | 326Lead |
| 432 | Total passes | 454Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Halmstad | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Halmstad | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Halmstad | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 21 |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |