Match statistics snapshot
- IF elfsborg created the clearer chances on xG (0.84 vs 0.91, Δ 0.07).
- IF elfsborg fired more attempts (12 vs 7 shots).
- Halmstad was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Halmstad | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 0.84 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.91Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 4 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 1Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Halmstad | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 287 | Accurate passes | 386Lead |
| 379 | Total passes | 483Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Halmstad | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Halmstad | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Halmstad | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |