Match statistics snapshot
- IF elfsborg created the clearer chances on xG (1.52 vs 2.26, Δ 0.74).
- IF elfsborg fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- IF elfsborg was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Halmstad | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.52 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.26Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 7 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Halmstad | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 393Lead | Accurate passes | 339 |
| 501Lead | Total passes | 428 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Halmstad | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Halmstad | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Halmstad | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |