Match statistics snapshot
- IFK Norrkoping created the clearer chances on xG (0.70 vs 2.38, Δ 1.68).
- IFK Norrkoping fired more attempts (17 vs 13 shots).
- IFK Norrkoping was more accurate in front of goal (41% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Ifk Norrkoping |
|---|---|---|
| 0.70 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.38Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 6 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Ifk Norrkoping |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 433Lead | Accurate passes | 282 |
| 543Lead | Total passes | 380 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Ifk Norrkoping |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Ifk Norrkoping |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Ifk Norrkoping |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |