Match statistics snapshot
- Halmstad created the clearer chances on xG (0.65 vs 0.51, Δ 0.14).
- Halmstad was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 27%).
- IFK Varnamo held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Ifk Varnamo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.65Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.51 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Ifk Varnamo |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 371 | Accurate passes | 549Lead |
| 475 | Total passes | 636Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Ifk Varnamo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Ifk Varnamo |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Ifk Varnamo |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.