Match statistics snapshot
- Mjallby AIF created the clearer chances on xG (0.81 vs 3.28, Δ 2.47).
- Mjallby AIF fired more attempts (19 vs 9 shots).
- Mjallby AIF held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 0.81 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.28Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 261 | Accurate passes | 381Lead |
| 351 | Total passes | 490Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |