Match statistics snapshot
- Mjallby AIF fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
- Mjallby AIF was more accurate in front of goal (70% on target vs 33%).
- Mjallby AIF held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 245 | Accurate passes | 453Lead |
| 339 | Total passes | 551Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.