Match statistics snapshot
- Halmstad created the clearer chances on xG (1.23 vs 0.73, Δ 0.50).
- Mjallby AIF fired more attempts (11 vs 5 shots).
- Mjallby AIF held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 1.23Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.73 |
| Offsides | ||
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 309 | Accurate passes | 496Lead |
| 405 | Total passes | 598Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |