Match statistics snapshot
- Ham-Kam fired more attempts (18 vs 12 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 22%).
- Bodo/Glimt held more of the ball (67% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Offsides | 5 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| 4 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 184 | Accurate passes | 468Lead |
| 258 | Total passes | 557Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |