Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (0.95 vs 2.51, Δ 1.56).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Ham-Kam was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 0.95 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.51Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 229 | Accurate passes | 508Lead |
| 301 | Total passes | 570Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.