Match statistics snapshot
- Fredrikstad created the clearer chances on xG (0.95 vs 1.84, Δ 0.89).
- Fredrikstad was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 17%).
- Fredrikstad held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 0.95 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.84Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 285 | Accurate passes | 411Lead |
| 378 | Total passes | 488Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.