Match statistics snapshot
- Haugesund created the clearer chances on xG (1.34 vs 1.38, Δ 0.04).
- Haugesund fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Haugesund held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 1.34 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.38Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 236 | Accurate passes | 510Lead |
| 323 | Total passes | 598Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.