Match statistics snapshot
- Ham-Kam created the clearer chances on xG (2.72 vs 0.86, Δ 1.86).
- Ham-Kam fired more attempts (24 vs 10 shots).
- Ham-Kam was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 2.72Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.86 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 19Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 489Lead | Accurate passes | 402 |
| 548Lead | Total passes | 463 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.