Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (19 vs 12 shots).
- KFUM Oslo was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 17%).
- Ham-Kam held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 435Lead | Accurate passes | 348 |
| 514Lead | Total passes | 412 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |