Match statistics snapshot
- Lillestrom created the clearer chances on xG (0.97 vs 1.25, Δ 0.28).
- Lillestrom fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- Ham-Kam was more accurate in front of goal (89% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 0.97 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.25Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 291 | Accurate passes | 449Lead |
| 359 | Total passes | 517Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| -0.59 | Goals prevented | -0.59 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |