Match statistics snapshot
- Ham-Kam created the clearer chances on xG (1.61 vs 0.73, Δ 0.88).
- Ham-Kam fired more attempts (18 vs 17 shots).
- Ham-Kam was more accurate in front of goal (28% on target vs 6%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Odd Ballklubb |
|---|---|---|
| 1.61Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.73 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 17 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Odd Ballklubb |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 256 | Accurate passes | 448Lead |
| 330 | Total passes | 513Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Odd Ballklubb |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Odd Ballklubb |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Odd Ballklubb |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.