Match statistics snapshot
- Ham-Kam fired more attempts (14 vs 7 shots).
- Ham-Kam was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
| 5Lead |
| 1 |
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 328Lead | Accurate passes | 319 |
| 418 | Total passes | 433Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.