Match statistics snapshot
- Both sides matched on xG (0.86 each).
- Rosenborg fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Ham-Kam was more accurate in front of goal (73% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 0.86 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.86 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 3 |
| 6Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 227 | Accurate passes | 465Lead |
| 305 | Total passes | 545Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.