Match statistics snapshot
- Rosenborg created the clearer chances on xG (1.30 vs 2.91, Δ 1.61).
- Rosenborg fired more attempts (20 vs 12 shots).
- Rosenborg was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.30 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.91Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 388 | Accurate passes | 457Lead |
| 457 | Total passes | 524Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.