Match statistics snapshot
- Ham-Kam created the clearer chances on xG (2.93 vs 0.21, Δ 2.72).
- Ham-Kam fired more attempts (25 vs 6 shots).
- Ham-Kam was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 2.93Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.21 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 19Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 15Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 521Lead | Accurate passes | 247 |
| 570Lead | Total passes | 297 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 12Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.