Match statistics snapshot
- Ham-Kam created the clearer chances on xG (1.42 vs 1.05, Δ 0.37).
- Sandefjord fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Sandefjord was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Sandefjord |
|---|---|---|
| 1.42Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.05 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Sandefjord |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 219 | Accurate passes | 478Lead |
| 309 | Total passes | 561Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Sandefjord |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Sandefjord |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Sandefjord |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.