Match statistics snapshot
- Ham-Kam created the clearer chances on xG (2.47 vs 2.08, Δ 0.39).
- Sandefjord fired more attempts (18 vs 15 shots).
- Sandefjord held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Sandefjord |
|---|---|---|
| 2.47Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.08 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Sandefjord |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 226 | Accurate passes | 462Lead |
| 301 | Total passes | 554Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Sandefjord |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Sandefjord |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Sandefjord |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |