Match statistics snapshot
- Stabaek created the clearer chances on xG (1.18 vs 4.13, Δ 2.95).
- Stabaek fired more attempts (21 vs 9 shots).
- Ham-Kam was more accurate in front of goal (78% on target vs 43%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Stabaek |
|---|---|---|
| 1.18 | Expected goals (xG) | 4.13Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 17Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 7 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Stabaek |
|---|---|---|
| 29% | Ball possession | 71%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 174 | Accurate passes | 518Lead |
| 252 | Total passes | 603Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Stabaek |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Stabaek |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Stabaek |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |