Match statistics snapshot
- Ham-Kam created the clearer chances on xG (1.16 vs 0.77, Δ 0.39).
- Ham-Kam was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 17%).
- Ham-Kam held more of the ball (54% possession).
Ham-kam vs Start
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Start |
|---|---|---|
| 1.16Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.77 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 3 | Shots off target | 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
| 12 | Total shots | 12 |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Start |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 393Lead | Accurate passes | 320 |
| 485Lead | Total passes | 414 |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Start |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Start |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -1.05 | Goals prevented | -1.05 |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Start |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |