Match statistics snapshot
- Ham-Kam created the clearer chances on xG (1.10 vs 0.77, Δ 0.33).
- Start fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Ham-Kam was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Start |
|---|---|---|
| 1.10Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.77 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Start |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 394Lead | Accurate passes | 316 |
| 484Lead | Total passes | 409 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Start |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Start |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -1 | Goals prevented | -1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Start |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |