Match statistics snapshot
- Stromsgodset created the clearer chances on xG (1.08 vs 1.31, Δ 0.23).
- Ham-Kam fired more attempts (22 vs 9 shots).
- Stromsgodset was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Stromsgodset |
|---|---|---|
| 1.08 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.31Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Stromsgodset |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 347Lead | Accurate passes | 288 |
| 447Lead | Total passes | 372 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Stromsgodset |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Stromsgodset |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Stromsgodset |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |