Match statistics snapshot
- Stromsgodset created the clearer chances on xG (1.02 vs 1.24, Δ 0.22).
- Stromsgodset fired more attempts (18 vs 12 shots).
- Ham-Kam was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Stromsgodset |
|---|---|---|
| 1.02 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.24Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Stromsgodset |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 332 | Accurate passes | 364Lead |
| 416 | Total passes | 444Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Stromsgodset |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Stromsgodset |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 11Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Stromsgodset |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.