Match statistics snapshot
- Ham-Kam was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 4 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target |
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 381 | Accurate passes | 399Lead |
| 475 | Total passes | 494Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |